E-NABLE Web Central
Jen
Public
Seen by 95
The SPC has been discussing how to move the e-NABLE web central effort forward, and the topic of providing some funding for further development came up. I'm proposing that some funds from the Google funding that e-NABLE received might help to enable further development by providing developer support. Among other things I'd particularly like to see more direct integration of the work we've been doing on follow up research. There has also been discussion of adding support for assistive devices that are not hands. We could split these kinds of things into multiple proposals or just generally support WebCentral.
What do folks think?
One othering that maybe belongs in a different post -- we really need more diversity of ideas for what to do with the money. I encourage others to post their ideas and requests for funding for whatever they are doing anyway!
Luis Bermudez Tue 27 Mar 2018 4:30PM
I'm happy to help with web development support. I've developed web apps and mobile apps for nearly a decade.
Poll Created Fri 30 Mar 2018 3:33PM
E-NABLE Web Central Closed Fri 13 Apr 2018 3:01PM
I'm proposing that some funds from the Google funding that e-NABLE received might help to enable further development by providing developer support. Among other things I'd particularly like to see more direct integration of the work we've been doing on follow up research. There has also been discussion of adding support for assistive devices that are not hands. We could split these kinds of things into multiple proposals or just generally support WebCentral.
Results
| Results | Option | % of points | Voters | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Agree | 100.0% | 16 |
|
| Abstain | 0.0% | 0 | ||
| Disagree | 0.0% | 0 | ||
| Block | 0.0% | 0 | ||
| Undecided | 0% | 67 |
|
16 of 83 people have participated (19%)
Luis Bermudez
Fri 30 Mar 2018 3:44PM
Who's going to be doing the web development? Usually this type of work is highly costly.
Richard Hodgdon
Sun 1 Apr 2018 2:10PM
I'd like to see goals split into individual proposals so the community can prioritize features and I look forward to the improvements!
Reg Bowie
Wed 4 Apr 2018 7:51PM
Agree
Jon Schull
Thu 12 Apr 2018 4:16PM
I'm agreement it but agree with Luis that the proposal is too vague for funding. I see this as agreement to go develop a concrete proposal.
Jacquin Buchanan Mon 2 Apr 2018 3:06AM
I agree with this. I think WebsCentral is a key part to keeping the E-nable community moving forward. I do think it could be worth dividing up various features into groupings so the community could somehow vote on priority.
Luis Bermudez Tue 3 Apr 2018 9:14PM
I have development training. I'm happy to help. Just come up with a list of feature requests. Then we can prioritize them based on market need and development cost (and other factors). A survey of feature requests is a good start (that way we know market need/want)
Luis Bermudez Thu 12 Apr 2018 12:57PM
This proposal is highly vague. What do you propose doing with the web central?
Richard Hodgdon · Tue 27 Mar 2018 2:59PM
My preference would be to see them done as individual proposals so the group has some say in which improvements are prioritized over others.