Constitution amendment: Our position on women's freedom

human beings is better than living beings in this context. Indeed seperate thread is much better as the topic is big.

For gender friendly learning spaces, I (me and my friends) have tried a few things in the past:

'Break the curfew' campaign- to extend the ladies' hostel curfew with all the needed safety like street lights in the campus, emergency fire exits in hostels etc

women hackathon- It was a program by SPACE to build a community of women with better technical skills. I redesigned the program by adding different aproach. Added discussions and games related to gender issues together with technical classes. And chose resource people who embraces learning process and not people who want to excercise power.

take back tech- (for various reason it only lasted few weeks) weekly gettogether (not only women) to discuss politics and tech. Not only discuss sometimes watching movie or creating a game whatever. But it was to ensure interaction between genders and try to build good discussions. (it was also in SPACE)(I am adding these here now because I will be travelling during the coming days so I cannot participate much in the discussions)

Thanks. We need to separate this into a basic principle, which is short and then add each points you mentioned in detailed in our manifesto https://pirates.org.in/manifesto

Assume we as a group is elected to form a govt, so what exact laws, schemes, campaigns we will launch. We don't have to do all of it at once, we can build this gradually one by one.

How about we add a Section 4 to Article 1 as "All the living beings are born free. But then in the process of growing the society build chains inside us. Each individual should realize their possibilities. So what we need to do is to create an 'environment' that help each individual to understand their chains and break it." Should we change "living beings" to "human beings"? Now with that as basic principle. Lets go into detail of each of the ideas you listed. We can add "We will create better gender friendly learning spaces" in the manifesto, but we should add more details as to how we are going to do it. Same for each of the other points you mentioned and possibly more we can think of. May be creating separate threads here for each of the items is better.

Now about freedom. Definitely I think all the living beings are born free. But then in the process of growing the society build chains inside us. We need to do things not to 'give' freedom to women because we are noone to 'give' freedom to another person, but each individual should realize their possibilities. So what we need to do is to create an 'environment' that help each individual to understand their chains and break it. The blog post from 2012 that you pointed has good material like you said. Other suggestions:

1. Better gender friendly learning spaces

2. Promote gender sensitive art

3. Women in different caste and class have different issues, so identify it from community. For that there needs to be representations from all the possible levels. (Issues of poor Dalit women are highly different from rich brahmin women)

4. Sex education for all

5. Good mainstream discussions on related topics.

   Each topic has lot of subtopics. And if I think more it can be continued.

Women feel safer if there are enough number of women in the street and no harassment. Bring more women in the street makes a loop. Both men and women should be educated to stop harassment and not to be traumatised by harassments. Men should learn to respect women as human beings and women should learn to understand it's not her dress or attittude that create the violence but the perpetrator's mentality.

If we propose police security during the night to ensure safety it's again another nightmare. As police is also part of the society which embraces the 'purity', they try to be parent of each women or try to make them again scared. During day time I guess women are more confident to stay in the streets.

Of course, enough street lights and rapidly responding police helpline are good to feel safer. But that doesn't stop domestic violences or violent mentalities. It may create a feel of security.

On considering the women safety-freedom question. We can connect this fear on a dangerous minority with the mindset of a majority.

The base of this mindset problem is, a majority in India believes, women hold some form of purity (which is of course designed according to the "culture and tradition") and its the women's responsibility to hold that purity intact. The idea of purity may vary with people and location, but mostly its lost when women don't follow "traditions" and in worse cases, occasions of sex (consensual or not) with non husband person. In later case, their life considered lost.

With this concept of purity and and with perspectives of looking women as property (and others), can give a feedback to a rape culture, which is not in general with other possible victims.

The point i would like to make is, this is an immediate safety issue, because only if people feel the streets are safe they prefer to go outside, which eventually make the streets safe and is a long term social problem that asks for programs to change people's above mindset (structural solutions like policies and projects to improve accessibility, empowerment and independence for women will give an indirect impact and awareness campaigns can give direct impacts).

I think Section 2 is ok as it is now. Adding that as different section is better.

Should we replace second sentence in Section 2 (currently "We will fight to ensure these rights are not denied to anyone.") to "We extend our support towards people who suffer from discrimination, has threat to safety, faces harassements, faces exclusion and faces inequality, in particular women." Or should we add that as a separate Section (Section 3)? You can use "Proposal" button at the bottom to propose it. If others suggest changes, we can always update it.

I don't think it is okay. In the first place those words project the world full of dangers for women, which is again a very mainstream thought. It's absurd to project that in the world of Kashmiris, Rohingyas, all other minorities etc. etc. My suggestion is something like (definitely needs editing):

We extend our support towards people who suffer from discrimination, has threat to safety, faces harassements, faces exclusion and faces inequality, in particular women.

Do you think the wording I proposed at the start is okay? or can you suggest a different wording that can be added to the constitution of Indian Pirates under basic principles? You can see the current version of the constitution at https://pirates.org.in/constitution

Topic seems better now. Indeed women are at the recieving end of violence than men. But while we give a picture of women are always in danger (which is false), we are doing a big mistake of making women scared again and stopping them from even trying out things. And their male friends are also being stressed while women start to do brave things. Instead we need to accept that violent people are very small proportion of the population. We have choice either to be afraid of that small portion and rest inside our bubble or build confidence and start exploring (it's not easy but doable). If it is the male counterpart then choice either to be stressed about women's safety and control dear female friends and transmit fear in order to 'protect' them or try to support in a way the friend feels better.