Loomio
Wed 27 Jun 2018 9:35AM

Wouldn't cotech.coop be better than coops.tech?

JD Josef Davies-Coates Public Seen by 93

I guess it doesn't make a huge amount of different but personally I think cotech.coop would be a lot better url for CoTech than our existing coops.tech domain (more pricey though)

What do you think? Does it matter?

SG

Simon Grant Wed 27 Jun 2018 10:12AM

cotech.coop

in the long run, but as others have said, cost and convenience may also be factors

SBH

Simon Ball (Blake House) Wed 27 Jun 2018 10:15AM

coops.tech (our current url)

I think this should be thought through strategically from a branding perspective before switching things up.

RB

Roy Brooks Wed 27 Jun 2018 10:47AM

cotech.coop

Conditional on overarching aims of Cotech - if to grow cooperatives .coop. If to focus on tech .tech

DU

Deleted account Wed 27 Jun 2018 10:58AM

cotech.coop

tech.coop

SH

Stephen Hawkes Wed 27 Jun 2018 3:07PM

cotech.coop

Already #1 on Google for cotech. But, makes sense to pick a TLD that it just for coops, and features the brand name explicitly

H

Hamish Wed 27 Jun 2018 9:39PM

coops.tech (our current url)

whilst i love the coop tld, cotech is a bit of a mouthful

DB

Doug Belshaw Thu 28 Jun 2018 7:12AM

coops.tech (our current url)

I'm forced to choose an option to comment, which seems problematic. There's a wider issue here. AFAIK, cotech is not a co-op but rather a collection/network of co-ops. Perhaps that should change?

G

Graham Thu 28 Jun 2018 2:33PM

cotech.coop

MC3 would be happy to contribute equitably towards costs.

KWO

Kayleigh Walsh Outlandish Thu 28 Jun 2018 2:51PM

coops.tech (our current url)

I don't think we should be focusing our efforts on minor points like this. Anyone can have a .coop domain so it's not fundamental to me. There's also a cost issue, so unless anyone is willing to own this and pay for it...if it ain't broke :)

ALP

Annie Legge (Dot Project) Fri 29 Jun 2018 9:59AM

coops.tech (our current url)

CoTech isn't technically a coop so I think this is confusing from a brand perspective, and there is brand projects underway, so whilst it is performing well already I don't see the reason to change in the short term. :thinking:

Load More