Universal name for the "Message Inbox"
I filed the issue on GitHub : The "Message(s) [and/or] Inbox / conversations" is too loosely denominated
What should be the one name of this messaging page?
"Message Inbox", tells the HTML title.
"conversations", tells the URL.
"Messages", tells the button's link title.
"Inbox", tells the page itself.
goob Wed 22 Jan 2014
'Conversations'. Although I'm happy for the heading on the page itself to read 'Inbox', which is what it is displaying down the left-hand column.
Steffen van Bergerem Wed 22 Jan 2014
I agree. conversation/conversations sounds good. Inbox could stay as a good title for the list of conversations.
maliktunga Wed 22 Jan 2014
I think as well that it should be universally referred as Conversations (plural).
However, I wouldn't mind if we'd read "Inbox" on the page itself, as long as the HTML head title would display Conversations.
Since we're all agreeing with Conversations, I think we're ready for a proposal!
maliktunga started a proposal Wed 22 Jan 2014
Universally rename the Message Inbox "Conversations" Closed Thu 30 Jan 2014
YES : "Message Inbox", "Conversations" and "Messages" will be merged into a single identity : Conversations. However, the page itself will keep the "Inbox" title.
YES : You think that "Message Inbox", "Conversations" and "Messages" should be merged into a single identity : Conversations. However, the page itself will keep the "Inbox" title.
NO : You think Conversations is a bad name or there's no need for change.
| Agree - 29 |
| Abstain - 29 |
| Disagree - 29 |
| Block - 29 |
maliktunga
Wed 22 Jan 2014
We could also rename the Inbox "Conversations", but I'm fine with the current proposal.
Erwan Guyader
Wed 22 Jan 2014
Seth Martin
Thu 23 Jan 2014
Rafael Raposo
Thu 23 Jan 2014
Karthikeyan A K
Thu 23 Jan 2014
Good idea
lebarjack
Thu 23 Jan 2014
NicoAlto
Thu 23 Jan 2014
theradialactive
Thu 23 Jan 2014
Jonne Haß
Thu 23 Jan 2014
Steffen van Bergerem
Thu 23 Jan 2014
goob
Thu 23 Jan 2014
Balasankar C
Thu 23 Jan 2014
Michael Engelhardt
Thu 23 Jan 2014
Marek Marecki
Thu 23 Jan 2014
[deactivated account]
Thu 23 Jan 2014
SuperTux88
Fri 24 Jan 2014
[deactivated account]
Fri 24 Jan 2014
Miroslav Mazel
Fri 24 Jan 2014
Paul Hill
Sat 25 Jan 2014
Jason Robinson
Sat 25 Jan 2014
Sebas Pedersen
Sun 26 Jan 2014
Elm
Mon 27 Jan 2014
Patrick Pankotsch
Tue 28 Jan 2014
Paul Greindl
Tue 28 Jan 2014
matl
Tue 28 Jan 2014
[deactivated account]
Wed 29 Jan 2014
Dee Baumdeesaster
Wed 29 Jan 2014
Tom Scott
Wed 29 Jan 2014
ventos
Wed 29 Jan 2014
Emmanouel Kapernaros
Wed 29 Jan 2014
Crazypedia
Thu 30 Jan 2014
keeping things as straight forward and simple for end users will drive up adoption. If your grandmother can use it, we are on the right track :)
FÁBIÁN Tamás László
Thu 30 Jan 2014
Waithamai
Thu 30 Jan 2014
maliktunga Thu 23 Jan 2014
Do you think it really is important to make the close date so distant? A whole week is quite long... and so far it seems pretty unanimous.
Jonne Haß Thu 23 Jan 2014
Yes.
maliktunga Thu 23 Jan 2014
Alright then!
goob Thu 30 Jan 2014
OK, pretty much unanimous. Before I make a PR (unless someone else wants to do it), should the labels be changed (e.g. 'message_inbox_badge' to 'conversations_badge') or just the text itself?
maliktunga Thu 30 Jan 2014
@goob Just released the outcome.
Yes, that would be more intuitive especially for future developers.
Flaburgan · Wed 22 Jan 2014
I'm fine with conversation.