Loomio

Ruby versions

JH Jonne Haß Public Seen by 74

Discussion on what Ruby versions to support, recommend and migrate to.

G

goob Fri 20 Dec 2013 12:18PM

OK thanks, both of you.

JR

Jason Robinson Sat 21 Dec 2013 1:15PM

@fabianrbz if you want to support 1.9.3 I think you should disagree, not agree? ;)

F

fabianrbz Sat 21 Dec 2013 1:16PM

@jasonrobinson, actually I don't, but I'm ok with supporting it for a while

JH

Poll Created Sun 29 Dec 2013 1:51PM

Run builds for Ruby 1.9.3 on Travis Closed Thu 2 Jan 2014 9:00PM

Outcome
by Jonne Haß Tue 25 Apr 2017 5:15AM

We keep running builds for Ruby 1.9.3 on Travis

Since we still want to support Ruby 1.9.3, we also shold invest the time on Travis for running builds on it.

Results

Results Option % of points Voters
Agree 28.6% 2 TS F
Abstain 57.1% 4 FS JH G DS
Disagree 14.3% 1 F
Block 0.0% 0  
Undecided 0% 46 ST MS AA S CB HF BO DM GC JH JR M EG G AX PP BB T DY SH

7 of 53 people have participated (13%)

JH

Jonne Haß
Abstain
Sun 29 Dec 2013 1:52PM

The differences between 2.0.0 and 1.9.3 aren't that big, though on the other hand we might not notice if we break backwards compatibility.

F

Flaburgan
Agree
Sun 29 Dec 2013 6:50PM

If we support it, it's kind of obvious we need to test it. We will remove it from travis the same time we will stop supporting it.

G

goob
Abstain
Sun 29 Dec 2013 8:16PM

Totally happy for the experts to decide. It sounds better to continue testing, but if there are serious performance implications, might have to drop it.

F

fabianrbz
Disagree
Mon 30 Dec 2013 3:47PM

the differences aren't that big and the cost of running our test suite in 1.9.3 and 2.0 are too high in my opinion... I know we want to have backward compatibility, but I think if something breaks we will know it via github...

DS

Dennis Schubert
Abstain
Wed 1 Jan 2014 9:32PM

I'd totally vote against it in favour of a easy ruby installation via the systems package manager. But as 2.0 has sooo many improvements, I'd be fine with dropping 1.9.*.

FS

Florian Staudacher
Abstain
Thu 2 Jan 2014 2:37AM

no strong feelings either way ... yes, we should keep CI for a version we continue to support, but yes, we should also try not to overstress Travis' resources we're gladly using for free

Load More