Abstention - Part 2 : Make wording in votes more congruent

Was unsure about the Stop thing first, but reading on a little it seems to be a quite consistent proposal. I would recommend to test it well first though!

I've never viewed the "abstain" as "undecided". It's an active choice: I've read the content, but don't feel I can provide meaningful input. I abstain a lot around experts.

If viewers were shown in charts, I'd just call them "viewers".

(See comment)

I vote for the changes with one remark for c) abstain should definitely count the people active in the discussion who didn't vote. And they are the ones which commented not the viewers.

I made a few comments earlier but forgot to vote

too many proposals at a time

This raises issues of privacy (stats kept and visible on who read what)
Instead, it could be written anonymously in letters under the pie (x people did not open the thread)
Block to Stop change sounds good to me though!

Same as @joope

I think abstention and view count are two quite different things.

Now I understand Part 1. I disagree, in special b) because it doesn't matter if someone did not read the proposal or did not decide. In both cases the group or the proposer should try to get in contact with the undecided (readers and not-readers).