[post] Fisconet est contraire au RGPD

Article publié en français : https://fr.pirateparty.be/vie-privee-carton-rouge-pour-les-services-publics/

Communiqué envoyé à la presse francophone aussi.

I made the translation to Dutch and changed some things (like the very small detail that *some of us actually went out of their way to make compaints about this, both in mail *and in person!!! **)

Can someone check the Dutch plz?

Ok. I did it, according to what I know about Dutch & writing.

Thanks a lot, Koen !

I guess it can be published now. Who volunteers to do it? :slight_smile:

The reason why the link didn't work was because the closing bracket was seen as part of the link. I added spaces around the link and now it works again. I typically try to do that by default, but must've forgotten here. Thx for noticing!

Now that I could see the text of the GBA online (before, I couldn’t activate the link), I compared it with what was written, and how it was written (by me, for example) in the part ‘Onze samenvatting’. Some changes to the way I wrote things before, seemed to be necessary (otherwise it wasn’t 100% correct, the way I wrote some things, I noticed). I applied those changes a few minutes ago. Maybe someone else could doublecheck if what ‘Onze samenvatting’ says, is now ok (maybe by comparing to the GBA link https://www.gegevensbeschermingsautoriteit.be/sites/privacycommission/files/documents/aanbeveling_01_2019.pdf , because that is the most original, hence most correct source).
Otherwise, I think the text is very close to be oké for publication (or oké for publication?), I guess.

Thanks @iljabaert and @koenvdp ! I'm preparing the article on Wordpress, but I noticed there is at least one missing paragraph. This one is not in the Dutch translation :

En décidant d'utiliser Microsoft pour sous-traiter un service public aussi basique que la mise à disposition de textes législatifs, le SPF Finances a choisi la facilité, le confort et la gratuité apparente au détriment du respect de la vie privée des citoyen·nes. Nous pensons au contraire qu'un service public, lequel est financé avec de l'argent public, devrait reposer sur du logiciel libre. Ceci permettrait de garantir un contrôle de la part des citoyen·nes, et cela contribuerait au bien commun en mettant ce code à disposition pour tout un chacun.

I'm wondering if there are other missing paragraphs as this one :/

I added two other points in French that doesn't seem to be translated (see pad).

fixed it in Dutch as well

I also happend to work on it. I don't know if we interferend with each other without knowing it :-) ---by the way: (amongst others) the two dispappeared are now added; I changed the sequence of one of the senteces (advanced it with two places) because I made it in that sentence a little more clear what that consentment (toestemming) is about, so the two sentences after it could be better understood by the reader.