Loomio
Wed 21 Aug 2013 2:31PM

NSFW content and the single post view

JH Jonne Haß Public Seen by 142

We need to decide if we want to enable the NSFW shield in the (new) SPV. See https://github.com/diaspora/diaspora/issues/3336 and https://github.com/diaspora/diaspora/pull/4410#issuecomment-22986956

Let me summarize the points so far raised

Pros:

  • A user may be pointed to a single post without knowing its contents.
  • It's not always clear in the notifications if the post you participated on was NSFW or not.

Cons:

  • Most of the time you go the the SPV to actually see the post, adding another click to that is bad UX.
JH

Jonne Haß Wed 21 Aug 2013 2:32PM

Personally I don't think we need it.

F

Faldrian Wed 21 Aug 2013 2:38PM

Maybe one should have the option (in the Header-Bar) to enable / disable NSFW-Content for the current diaspora-session? So that you don't have to individually click every nsfw-shield but just decide "i'm at work / with friends" and turn it off - or turn it on, just as you want to.

RB

Roger Braun Wed 21 Aug 2013 2:47PM

I think it's superflous. There is no paging anymore in the new SPV, so noone can reach an NSFW post by accident, except if pointed to by someone else, in which case it is their responsibility.

ST

Sean Tilley Wed 21 Aug 2013 4:32PM

Honestly, I think the NSFW is fine just on the stream, but putting it into a post is redundant. I agree on the point that adding an extra click to see a post is bad UX.

G

goob Wed 21 Aug 2013 6:25PM

I think it's redundant except in the case where someone sends someone else a 'dodgy' link without a warning, but that's not the kind of case that Diaspora's software should be coding for, I don't think.

Block NSFW on the streams, as people haven't then signed up to seeing that image. Clicking a link to view a post in the SPV is in itself pretty much an authorisation to view that material.

JR

Jason Robinson Wed 21 Aug 2013 6:59PM

I'd go for dumping the NSFW in SPV - good points by Jonne in the opening.

FS

Florian Staudacher Wed 21 Aug 2013 9:26PM

how about a "timed" overlay ... if a post is really #nsfw, the content is hidden and the overlay says something like "this content is #nsfw, showing it in 3 ... 2.... 1"
which would give you a chance to "hit the panic button" and close the tab/window.

JH

Jonne Haß Wed 21 Aug 2013 9:30PM

Sounds... complicated. And still not really needed IMO.

SM

Seth Martin Thu 22 Aug 2013 4:13AM

It would only be annoying any place other than the stream.

M

Maciek Łoziński Wed 28 Aug 2013 3:38PM

Countdown overlay is also bad UX in my opinion. I'd rather do one more click - it's faster.

S

StarBlessed Thu 29 Aug 2013 10:38PM

Just a thought. This seems to be more about exposure to NSFW content, than how it is displayed in SPV.

So what about something like this : in the nav bar (next to "Stream" and "My Activity", there is two user selectable buttons "SFW" and "NSFW" or something similar.

When you click on "SFW", all posts tagged with #nsfw are hidden from the stream.

Also, on a related issue, I have noticed another niggly little problem.

If a User is set to NSFW in their profile and shares a public post, that post can then be reshared without the #nsfw tag.

MM

Marek Marecki Sat 31 Aug 2013 8:10PM

I agree with @jonnehass that we don't need it.

G

goob Thu 9 Jan 2014 5:02PM

Is it time to take a vote on this so we can either close the Github issues (if we decide NSFW protection on SPV pages is redundant) or look for someone to work on it (if we decide it's needed)?

Most of the comments above suggest it is redundant in SPV, albeit with some exceptions. Do we need a vote to consolidate this?

JH

Jonne Haß Thu 9 Jan 2014 6:08PM

I guess we do... Mind setting one up? Thanks :)

G

goob Thu 9 Jan 2014 8:16PM

Sure.

G

Poll Created Thu 9 Jan 2014 8:18PM

Apply NSFW shielding to posts in SPV Closed Sun 19 Jan 2014 8:08PM

Outcome
by goob Tue 25 Apr 2017 5:15AM

The NSFW shield won't be applied to posts in the single-post view.

Is it desirable for content marked NSFW to be hidden in single-post view as well as in the stream? YES if you think NSFW posts should be hidden in SPV, NO if you think this is not necessary.

See discussion for pros and cons.

Results

Results Option % of points Voters
Agree 14.3% 4 PC FT A AA
Abstain 21.4% 6 FS L N X R M
Disagree 64.3% 18 JH JR F EG G DM DS DU SM SVB S J M KAK MM S QD MM
Block 0.0% 0  
Undecided 0% 252 BK ST MS TS AA S CB HF BO DM GC JH RF M G AX PP BB LP T DY SH DU H M RF R P EP E S AS MK R JD PP F PA SK A G TT J NV N CB BC T RD O MS M RS- TM IS D MZ TM MB PG IGM M EK JS AL MS R OU KM DS W MS P S JL N AKS SJ RD A N V A B JB DC S S V PS AA C S JS MP GL DU VM E EA P DO DN FO TB JB L EM C LS MS MM HSB AMQ DU VK D AV FL Y JD A AT S AM MDB M FS MM RV HL GK DU DV E E TA T R L T SP RF CM DE D M DU DL MJS J JHI E ED CC G J DU MS F NR B Y JM DS SA MN SM LM CG A FF CK H L A KS RD M ATA UV N EL AC K AM KM RM H C MF AI AG TRA CJC S DU SC TM FT M GS DV BS LR HS S MS DA CA AF AS A MN T AR S GZ BJ AP J C TW HC T MK MC T MS R F EAP JB JD VP FC TT SD SS HE JM NL AA ASM A TJ M GZ C S CK

28 of 280 people have voted (10%)

EG

Erwan Guyader
Disagree
Thu 9 Jan 2014 9:50PM

Maybe make sure we disclose the fact that the post is NSFW in both the notification and the notification email.

KAK

Karthikeyan A K
Disagree
Fri 10 Jan 2014 3:39AM

I disagree

PC

Pawel Chojnacki
Agree
Fri 10 Jan 2014 9:15AM

From what I understand hiding NSFW in SPV can prevent people being direct-linked to posts with explicit material and opening it at spot.

A

Adrenalin
Agree
Sun 12 Jan 2014 12:36PM

NSFW in SPV can make sense to avoid a surprise if people open the SPV via the notifications menu.

It would be useless for those opening a NSFW posting from the stream-view.

A

Adrenalin
Agree
Sun 12 Jan 2014 12:37PM

NSFW in SPV can make sense to avoid a surprise if people open the SPV via the notifications menu or via email notification.

It would be useless for those opening a NSFW posting from the stream-view.

R

Ryuno-Ki
Abstain
Mon 13 Jan 2014 11:29PM

I skip #NSFW posts all together, so I have no opinion on this.

AA

Alberto Aru
Agree
Tue 14 Jan 2014 12:51PM

That should be an individual question. Best thing is to have the choice to select if we want to hide or not the NSFW content in the configuration menu.

M

maliktunga
Abstain
Sat 18 Jan 2014 7:36PM

I am not in a position in which NSFW is useful for me.

S

StarBlessed
Disagree
Sat 18 Jan 2014 8:23PM

We need to find a better way to manage NSFW long term, but until something better, I think what we have is adequate.

FT

faust twi
Agree
Sun 19 Jan 2014 4:49AM

it's reaaaally hard to use diaspora at work. i have to turn off all pictures and without pictures social networks are pretty useless and poor thing. i think you just don't know what to do with diaspora.

A

Adrenalin Sun 12 Jan 2014 12:34PM

NSFW in SPV can make sense to avoid a surprise if people open the SPV via the notifications menu.

It would be useless for those opening a NSFW posting from the stream.

AA

Alberto Aru Sun 12 Jan 2014 4:23PM

I agree with @faldrian, that should be an individual question. Best thing is to have the choice to select if we want to hide or not the NSFW content in the configuration menu.