A new constitution for democratic confederation of communities.

I don't think the world has much time either. "Long-term" is a subjective concept in my comment above.

I think that a truly inclusive constitution of common interests at a global level may evolve as we address a variety of challenges at each level of society, but mostly from the grassroots up in small communities which converge at broader levels.

We can brainstorm and model constitutions which may be more or less appropriate for a global society which emerges from real community interactions. I think that such models will only come to fruition if they coincide with many other realizations about how we talk and how we collaborate. Frankly, I'm quite skeptical that we could ever get most people to accept such realizations via some masterful complex, holistic argument, such as a complete constitution.

(I strongly favor modular design and modular organization.)

You've written well, and many anarchists might agree with most of what you've already composed without any real resistance. Many others would dismiss the whole idea immediately because, well, they don't really believe in society based on voluntary relationships to begin with. That's where my battle seems to mostly lie: developing anarchism itself, and making it persuasively effective and powerful at significant scales of community.

Everyone is talking. Only Rojava is trying.

They aren't big, but they are bookchin based.

We are either working together or working apart. I'm hoping that this might generate some buzz for working together.

People like you and already follow some version of this inside us. With luck, we can get people to talk. Communicate and collaborate.

And if things go south, maybe some of this will help little direct democracies kick off.

I'd love to get the rights and responsibilities separated from this. Or laid out in a more easily fashion.

The ongoing, living experiment in Rojava is deeply awesome.

Like I said, I have other priorities, and from my personal perspective those priorities are more urgent than your goals here. I could give you a bunch of reading material to 'justify' my focus on basic issues in communications and collaboration, instead of political organization. However, I'm content to agree to disagree on personal priorities.

I'm not trying to dissuade you in the huge goal here; I'm just trying to point out some challenges I personally perceive. I can definitely put more thought into this, and try to help it evolve. Who knows; maybe it will develop to a state which I can identify with.

I'm hoping that's the case for all of us

I'm dualistic... I'm working on this, while also doing local preparation for more urgent matters.