Loomio
Fri 29 Sep 2017 10:51PM

e-NABLE Project Proposals

JS Jeremy Simon Public Seen by 124

Have a project you'd like to undertake for the e-NABLE volunteer community? Create a new thread in the E-nablio to discuss it, and when you think it's it's ripe, write a proposal in that thread to allow the community to vote on whether or not the project should move forward. Project proposals may include a request for funding, but this is optional (some projects may not require funding).

To ensure everyone has the information needed to make an informed decision, each project proposal should include the following information at a minimum:

  1. Clear description of work to be performed
  2. Expected results/impact
  3. Estimate of work effort involved (# of hours)
  4. Estimated timeline for completion of the effort
  5. Names of individuals responsible for completing work
  6. Amount of funding being requested (if any) - please specify an exact amount, not a range. If the project is approved, we need to know how much funding to allocate
  7. A brief overview of your background with e-NABLE (work you've done in the past) - so people know who is proposing the project

Feel free to include a link to a Google Doc with a more detailed project outline.

Ownership of work products

In the spirit of the e-NABLE community, any work products resulting from a funded project will be considered open source and available for anyone to use. Please be prepared to share your work so others may benefit from your results.

To Submit a Project Proposal

To submit a project proposal, go to the main E-nablio page on Loomio and click the New Decision button, then select Proposal. Copy and paste the template content below and provide the details for your proposal. Set the voting duration to at least one week (preferably longer) to allow sufficient community input.

Project Approval

Each project proposal must receive at least 15 votes with at least 80% of the votes in support of the project in order to be approved. This number of required votes may increase in the future, as participation in this process grows stronger.

For determining the approval percentage, "Abstain" votes are not counted in the total. So the formula for the approval percentage is:
(A / (A + D)) * 100
Where A = # of Agree Votes and D = # of Disagree Votes

To be approved, both criteria (minimum number of votes and percentage support) must be met. For example, if a proposal has 20 "Agree" votes and 10 "Disagree" votes, that would meet the minimum number of votes, but it would not meet the required percentage (since only 66.7% of the votes are in support of the project). In this case, the project would not be approved.

Project Sponsorship

While not required, it is recommended that mini-grant proposals be sponsored by an e-NABLE Chapter. A proposal that includes a chapter sponsorship will have a higher likelihood of being approved.

Here are some suggestions for having a proposal sponsored:

  • The project owner can be part of an e-NABLE Chapter and the chapter can act as project sponsor.
  • If the project owner is not part of a chapter, the project owner may connect with an existing chapter and ask them to sponsor the project.
  • The project owner will report the project status to the chapter, and the chapter will report back to the community via weekly SPC (Strategic Planning Committee) meetings.
  • The funds will be given to the chapter, and the chapter will allocate funds to the project owner/team based on project deliverables.
  • The project owner will be accountable for the project deliverables and the Chapter will act as the project sponsor, ensuring that project deliverables are completed and commitments fulfilled.

.
.
.


Project Proposal Template (copy and paste the below content to create your own proposal)

Proposals can also include images, links, etc., using Markdown.

A convenient markdown editor can be found here:


Description of Proposed Project:

[Replace with your content]

Expected results/impact:

[Replace with your content]

Estimate of work effort involved:

[Replace with your content]

Estimated timeline for completion:

[Replace with your content]

Names of individuals responsible for deliverables:

[Replace with your content]

Amount of funding being requested:

[Replace with your content]

A brief overview of my background with e-NABLE:

[Replace with your content]

NOTE: The formatting will not transfer when you copy and paste to a new proposal. Preface a line with # (followed by a space) to format it as a heading.

JS

Jeremy Simon
Agree
Fri 3 Nov 2017 2:08PM

Looks like an interesting project! Should result in some useful data for the e-NABLE community.

PB

Peter Binkley
Agree
Fri 3 Nov 2017 3:59PM

Looks like a well designed study. Has this type of accelerometer been used in similar studies?

JS

Jon Schull
Abstain
Fri 3 Nov 2017 7:56PM

very exciting! Would you provide a link to the supporting materials? (Research design, IRB proposal)
What actigraph product? etc.
@JenMankoff has co-developed a sensor device that might be an alternative to the actigraph. ...

JS

Jon Schull
Agree
Sun 5 Nov 2017 2:42AM

very exciting! Thanks for you supporting materials! (Research design, IRB proposal)
What actigraph product? etc.
@JenMankoff has co-developed a sensor device that might be an alternative to the actigraph. ...

JS

Jon Schull
Agree
Tue 7 Nov 2017 2:04AM

very exciting! Thanks for you supporting materials! (Research design, IRB proposal)
What actigraph product? etc.
@JenMankoff has co-developed a sensor device that might be an alternative to the actigraph. ...

EL

Everton Lins Fri 3 Nov 2017 6:11PM

For now I will abstain from the proposal Using 3D Prosthetic Hands to Improve the Quality of Life of Appalachian Children because I have some questions.

Cole, could you help me with the questions below?

Thank you very much!

  • Is this study a paper that you must present to the university as part of your professional training and that will be graded or is it voluntary work?
  • After the project is completed the data (raw data) will belong to the university or will be available to be used in other projects of the e-NABLE community?
  • Have you found the 5 children that will participate in the study?
  • Will statistical data be generated based on 3 to 5 case studies or you plan to acquire more participants?
  • Do you already have the devices (ActiGraph Link) for the project?
  • Since the connection software comes with the device you are requesting funds to acquire the data interpretation software only?
CC

Cole Carter Fri 3 Nov 2017 8:54PM

Thanks for the reply Everton.
This is not a graded project. It is sponsored by my university in which I get lab space and funds for some supplies. My grant covers hard supplies but not the software. I was initially planning on using the Actigraph GT3X-BT. I will have grant funds available soon, and have not purchased the devices. As far as I know, the devices and software can be sold separately. I was able to get a discount quote of $1000 for one full package. I would be happy to share my data, and want to continue the collaborative spirit. I am also interested in the sensor device that @jonschull mentioned, and hope to learn more soon!

I do not have the participants yet, but I am in active communication with occupational therapists and certified prosthetists who have offered e-NABLE devices to patients who they see fit. Through communication with these professionals, I have made a hand for one individual, and I am currently in the process of two more. Whether I will be able to get Actigraphy data on these two individuals is to be determined, but I have gathered baseline survey data.

I plan for this to be an ongoing project, and this is a pilot study to provide proof of concept for more large scale, collaborative studies. I greatly value the team efforts of e-NABLE, and hope to help and participate!

EL

Everton Lins Sun 5 Nov 2017 4:10PM

Thanks for the feedback, @colecarter.
As @jonschull pointed, if Jennifer's sensor delivers the output you need for the study, can we consider using it instead Actigraph?
I think using it as the standard device will make it easier to reproduce the tests with other e-NABLE groups after this proof of concept.

CC

Cole Carter Tue 7 Nov 2017 4:40PM

@evertonlins, while I like the idea of somehow incorporating Jennifer's sensors, I think it would be valuable to gather Actigraph data first, as it is considered by many to be the "gold standard" method for tracking activity and movement. Furthermore, Actigraphy data may be a good control for evaluating other tracking methods.

RB

Rich B Tue 7 Nov 2017 1:40PM

I Agree: The Big Picture here is that it will be a published medical study. I would love to see a larger group involved with a plan to follow in 6 month periods. IRB's are keeping us out of Shriners in Tampa and this study may help open other doors.

Load More