Bountysource
New discussion relating to Bountysource, and "funding" bug fixing and feature implementation via this channel.
https://bountysource.com/teams/diaspora
Continuation of this discussion.
Jason Robinson Fri 7 Nov 2014 10:24PM
Sean Tilley Fri 7 Nov 2014 10:58PM
I don't think the integration would be a bad thing. If it gives incentives for developers to help out with harder tasks, I could see it as having a positive outcome.
Jason Robinson Fri 7 Nov 2014 11:05PM
I'd personally vote for the body text and the label. The issue title is a bit ... too much maybe :P
Flaburgan Fri 7 Nov 2014 11:46PM
About bounty source, you can also read the point to discuss for our next meeting.
Jason Robinson Sat 8 Nov 2014 1:55AM
Well, I'm admin now. How do we maintain membership? Github org members? Vote for anyone else?
And what next? Should we promote it via official accounts? I see no reason why not to, might as well give it a try, the site seems quite nifty and supports bitcoin too which is nice.
Jonne Haß Sat 8 Nov 2014 11:00PM
That close button is easy to click ;)
Rich Sun 9 Nov 2014 11:48AM
Couldn’t there be a risk that the organization become flooded by bad quality PR all to get money ?
No, because the money would not go to the organisation, it goes to the developer.
Jason Robinson · Fri 7 Nov 2014 10:24PM
Firstly - we have no official team members there yet. I've applied, being one of the members in the github organization.
Secondly - Bountysource integrates with github. This means if someone donates money to an issue, Bountysource can update the issue with some details, like label, amount, etc.
See image attachment. The options are:
Do we want this integration, and with what parts, some, all or none?