Loomio
Sun 26 Nov 2017 10:20PM

QGIS 3.0 Soft Feature Freeze

TS Tim Sutton Public Seen by 29

Please refer to the previous discussion on the developer list for more context on this discussion. This thread is to determine when the feature freeze for 3.0 will take effect. The following items are currently listed as exempt from the freeze:

According to our proposal the freeze status will be voted on a fortnightly basis.

MP

Mathieu Pellerin
Agree
Sun 17 Dec 2017 5:37AM

Looks like we might not need another extension if the pace doesn't change, great!

WM

Werner Macho
Agree
Sun 17 Dec 2017 8:46AM

I'm with the others .. This should be the last extension. We're close to have everything included and at some point should come to an end and fullfill the predictions we do for our "professional" users

TS

Poll Created Mon 1 Jan 2018 7:39PM

Shall we continue the soft freeze for two more weeks? Closed Thu 4 Jan 2018 7:34PM

Please see https://www.loomio.org/d/38Aiya0q/3-0-soft-freeze-exemptions for any other incoming exception requests.

Results

Results Option % of points Voters
Agree 22.2% 2 DU AP
Abstain 33.3% 3 TS AB ND
Disagree 44.4% 4 PC MK DR MP
Block 0.0% 0  
Undecided 0% 18 GS JF MD WM NW LS AN SL S TK M PB HM PK SB RB SM V

9 of 27 people have participated (33%)

ND

Nyall Dawson
Abstain
Mon 1 Jan 2018 9:05PM

Unsure... Final two PRs are in for layouts work (and will hopefully be merged before this poll expires!). Can we get a status report on the remaining metadata work?

TS

Tim Sutton
Abstain
Mon 1 Jan 2018 11:30PM

@nyall the metadata work we were hoping to have done before the xmas break. Etienne is just finishing up the file system read/write support - I hope he will have it within the next week or so. Any plans for ATLAS support in 3.0?

MP

Mathieu Pellerin
Disagree
Tue 2 Jan 2018 1:27AM

I think we've reached a point where we sounds terminate the soft freeze and declare its use a success story. The vote-every-two-weeks method turned out to be a great way to give devs flexibility while avoiding a total absence of ETA altogether.

AP

Alessandro Pasotti
Agree
Wed 3 Jan 2018 8:25AM

I think that we'd benefit from at least one more week: the layout PR is not yet completed and there might be are other PRs in the queue that worth a closer look.

AB

Alexander Bruy
Abstain
Wed 3 Jan 2018 10:34AM

IMHO we can move to the hard freeze if remaining pull-requests will be reviewed and merged in reasonable time

MK

Matthias Kuhn
Disagree
Wed 3 Jan 2018 10:55AM

I think it's time to move on and set the finish line. Let's push towards getting things fixed and call it a release cycle. Qt is also aiming at version 6, so we can do 4 as well :D http://blog.qt.io/blog/2017/02/22/qt-roadmap-for-2017/

DU

Borys Jurgiel
Agree
Wed 3 Jan 2018 3:07PM

After long thinking, +1 for the very last time, so Nyall and Etienne have a bit more flexibility with last minute changes. Other PRs seem to be a bit abandoned, so I hope it won't really postpone the release.

Load More